Petitioner challenged an order in a matrimonial case via writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on a memo filed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:13316 WP No. 107097 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 107097 OF 2014 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
PRAMOD S/O. VEERAPPA KATAGERI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: CONDUCTOR IN KSRTC, R/O. HALAKURKI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI PRAKASH N. HOSAMANE, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. SHAILAJA W/O. PRAMOD KATAGERI , AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: LAB TECHNICIAN, R/O. SHIRUR, TQ & DIST: BAGALKOT.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT IS SERVED)
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A BYAHATTI
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 09.04.2014 PASSED ON I.A.NO.I IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.43/2012 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT AT BAGALKOT AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Advocate for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has
become infructuous and he has filed a memo in this regard.
Memo is taken on record.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
RSH / Ct-mck List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PRAMOD S/O. VEERAPPA KATAGERI
SMT. SHAILAJA W/O. PRAMOD KATAGERI
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
