Disposed

Sri K E Paramesh v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2023WP/10649/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondent Tahasildar to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10th January 2023. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the matter within three months without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 10th January, 2023 and pass appropriate orders within three months.

Sri K E Paramesh Vs State of Karnataka — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:38167 WP No. 10649 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10649 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. K.E. PARAMESH S/O EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O KENCHANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 213.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. SHANTAKUMAR K.C., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶12

Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S

¶13

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHPURA SUB-DIVISION, SAKALESHPURA - 573 127.

¶15

THE TAHASILDAR, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 213.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. C.N. MAHADESHWARAN, AGA)

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE

¶19

¶20

NC: 2023:KHC:38167 WP No. 10649 of 2023

¶21

REPRESENTATION/APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 10^TH JANUARY, 2023 AND PASS APPROPROTE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW VIDE ANNEXURE-F; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Heard Sri. Shantakumar K.C., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. C.N. Mahadeshwaran, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.

¶24

The short question involved and this writ petition is with regard to consideration of representation/application dated 10^th January, 2023 (Annexure-F) filed by the petitioner to the respondent No.3.

¶25

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation dated 10^th January, 2023 (Annexure-F) in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

¶26

SD/JUDGE

¶27

ARK

Sri K E Paramesh v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri K E Paramesh v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K Veerabhadrachari Vs the State of Karnataka

N Vittal Shetty Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. N. Anjanappa, Vs the State of Karnataka

Abdul Wazid S/O Late Bakhar Alisha Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. S.D. Lakshmana S/O Dasegowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Krishna Prasad H.K., Vs the State of Karnataka