Writ petition for quashing an order under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The court dismissed the petition as per incuriam for non-prosecution since the petitioner failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:13504
WP No. 105900 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 105900 OF 2014 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHANTAVVA KOM CHANDRAGOUDA PATIL , AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BELWADI, NOW RESIDING AT: PATIL GALLI, BAILHONGAL, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELGAUM.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI GANGADHAR S. HOSAKERI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A BYAHATTI
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16.02.2013 BEARING NO. SoKa:KOE 8196 NooMu 2013 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-P.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last
date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioner.
The writ petition is of the year 2014. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RSH / Ct-mck
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Shantavva Kom Chandragouda Patil
The State of Karnataka
Bashavappa Patil
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
