Petitioner challenged US divorce decree and sought custody and withdrawal of criminal complaints. Parties settled; decree accepted, custody given to husband, and petitioner released funds. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn based on the parties' mutual agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14527 WP No. 105117 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 105117 OF 2021 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. NANDINI W/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O. NOW R/O. LIG 77, HOUSING BOARD, NETAJI NAGAR, TQ: & DIST: BALLARI-583101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL & SRI. VYAS DESAI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
ROHAN HADIMANI T Digitally signed by ROHAN HADIMANI T
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.B. KANAVI, ADV. FOR R1; SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADV. FOR R2; SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA FOR R3 TO R5; NOTICE TO R6 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION OR DECLARATION OR WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PASSED ON 19.05.2021 IN THE CASE NO.21SL-DR00416 BY CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTRY, MISSOURI, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN DISSOLVING OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-F; ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION OR DECLARATION THAT JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PASSED ON 19.05.2021 IN THE CASE NO.21SL-DR00416 BY CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTRY, MISSOURI, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS VOID AB INITIO AND NOT BINDING ON PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.2; ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 3, 4, 5 AND 6 TO MAKE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR RETURN OF MAYERA KOMEPALLI I.E., GIRL CHILD BORN TO THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.2 THROUGH THEIR WEDLOCK TO THE CUSTODY OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND A1 COMPLAINT AND FIR CRIME NO.1/2021 DATED 04.01.2021 REGISTERED BY BALLARI WOMEN P.S.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The advocates for the petitioner and respondents jointly submit that the petitioner is the wife and respondent No.2 is the husband and that the present writ petition pertains to the matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2.
submitted that the criminal case filed by the petitioner against respondent No.2 has been quashed and she has not filed any other criminal case against respondent No.2. For the said reason, it is prayed that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
RH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Smt. Nandini W/o. Venkata Reddy
Rohan Hadimani T
The Union of India, Represented By Its Foreign Secretary
Sri. Venkatareddy @ Kommeppi Venkatareddy
The Director-General & Inspector General of Police, Karnataka
The Superintendent of Police, Bellary District
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
