The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as infructuous at the instance of counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 10157 OF 2018 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENUGOPAL M S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER AND TAKE ACTION ON THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 9.7.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
infructuous.
SR
Sd/JUDGE
Sri K. Vijayakumar
Sri Lakshminarayana
Sri Sandeep
State of Karnataka
The Panchayath Development Officer
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
