The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 as having become infructuous because the underlying regular appeal had already been allowed by the trial court in a subsequent order dated 14.02.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO. 101376 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
ARJUN BAPUSAHEB SALPEKAR OCC. AGRICULTURE AND COOLIE, R/O. CHILAMUR, TAL. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VITTHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH
Digitally signed by SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH Date: 2023.12.21 11:16:04 +0530
RAVI VITHAL SALPEKAR OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHILAMUR, TAL. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRETION QUAHSING THE ORDER DATED 04.01.2020 PASSED ON IA NO1 RA NO.07/2018 BY THE SENIR CIVIL JUDGE, RAMDURG VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous as the Regular Appeal No.7/2018 has been allowed vide judgment and decree dated 14.02.2022.
Submission is placed on record.
Writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
NAA
ARJUN BAPUSAHEB SALPEKAR
SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH
RAVI VITHAL SALPEKAR
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
