The High Court of Karnataka dismissed this writ appeal, holding that the controversy is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment (W.A.No.4861/2010 dated 03.01.2023) which also dismissed the writ appeal. The appeal is disposed of by relying on the reasoning of the said judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WA No. 830 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
WRIT APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2010 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJA DATTA KUMAR S/O RAJA JAYASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.3, 36TH CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ASHWIN PRABHU., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
WA No. 830 of 2010
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
WA No. 830 of 2010
R/AT SUNNY FARMS, NO.64, GOTTIGERE VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D S RAMACHANDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R6; SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 28.02.2011, R7 & R8 ARE DELETED;
M/S KING & PARTRIDGE FOR R9 & R10)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED ON 11.02.2010 IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.15156/2005 BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri.Ashwin Prabhu, learned counsel for appellant.
2. Sri.D.S.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for
respondent Nos.1 and 2.
WA No. 830 of 2010
respondent Nos.3 and 6
respondent No.4.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal is maintainable against the order dated 11.02.2010 passed in W.P.No.15156/2005.
Whether the controversy is covered by the judgment dated 03.01.2023 in W.A.No.4861/2010.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.A.No.4861/2010Referred¶49
Sri. Raja Datta Kumar
Government of Karnataka
State of Karnataka
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
Bangalore Development Authority
Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority
Allok Aradhe
Shivashankar Amarannavar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
