This writ appeal was dismissed for default because the appellants failed to remove office objections despite seven opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2023 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SHARADA VANI B
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SMT.LATHA S S .,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MURUGESH V CHARATI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:43329-DB WA No. 379 of 2023
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.NILOUFER AKBAR., AGA FOR R1)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO i) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.06.2014 PASSED BY THE HONBLE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION No. 8829/2014 (LA-BDA) AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL BY DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION. ii) GRANT ANY SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGEMENT
The Office records show that in spite of granting seven opportunities, the Office Objections are not removed by the Appellants till date.
Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Bsv
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
Bangalore Development Authority
State of Karnataka Urban Development Department
M. Narayanappa
Mr Prasanna B. Varale
Mr Justice Krishna S Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
