Smt Rathnamma v. Sri Nagaraju
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal under Section 100 CPC for withdrawal. Court upheld the withdrawal filed by the appellant and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Appellant's appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:40046 RSA No. 988 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 988 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT HALEBELAGOLA VILLAGE SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S SUDHARSAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- SRI NAGARAJU
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA
- respondent
SRI NAGARAJU
- respondent
SRI NAVEEN S/O NAGARAJU
- respondent
SRI GANGADHAR S/O NAGARAJU
- respondent
SMT SHARADA D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/988/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court