Dismissed
Babu v. Smt. Mamtaz Begam
Karnataka HCRSA/973/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Regular Second Appeal No. 973 of 2020 for non-compliance with peremptory directions to comply with office objections by the date 25.01.2023.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the order dated 25.01.2023.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
RSA No. 973 of 2020
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶4
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
¶5
BEFORE
¶6
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
¶7
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.973 OF 2020 (POS)
¶8
BETWEEN:
¶9
- BABU S/O M.KUPPASWAMY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT AMBEDKAR CIRCLE OLD TOWN BHADRAVATHI -577 301
¶10
…APPELLANT
¶11
(BY SRI SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT B., ADVOCATE–[ABSENT])
¶12
AND:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Babu
- respondent
Smt. Mamtaz Begam
- respondent
Thabhusem
- respondent
Gule Kousar
- respondent
Smt. Nanjamma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/973/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court