This regular second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant's counsel appeared via video conferencing and submitted that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal, which the court accepted.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:23267 RSA No. 910 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.910 OF 2022 (SP)
BETWEEN:
DR. VINAY S.YELI S/O DR.S.M.YELI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 2717, 2nd MAIN, 2nd CROSS, MCC B BLOCK, DAVANGERE - 577 004.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. UMESH MOOLIMANI., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S.V.PRAKASH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:23267 RSA No. 910 of 2022
BELLUDIGALLI, DAVANGERE - 577 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Umesh Moolimani., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.S.V.Prakash., for appellant has appeared through video conferencing.
Counsel submits that the Regular Second Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
NC: 2023:KHC:23267 RSA No. 910 of 2022
The oral submission made by learned counsel for
appellant is placed on record.
The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61
Dr. Vinay S.Yeli
Ganeshmal Oswal
Manjula
Ganesh
I.S. Shylaja
Kum. Himashwetha
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
