Sri Sunil Narayan v. K N Nagaraju
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 794 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
No. 794 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 794 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.794 OF 2020 (SP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
APPELLANT NOS.1 & 2 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. NANI R. CHOKSEY S/O LATE R B CHOKSEY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS NO.130/1, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042.
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.227, S V ROAD, BANDRA WEST, MUMBAI AND BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.130/1, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 42. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR NANI R CHOKSEY.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ISMAIL MUNEEB MUSBA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ALL ARE R/AT UGANWADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK.
RSA No. 794 of 2020
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT UGANAWADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Ismail Muneeb Musba., learned counsel for appellants has appeared in person.
The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 22.05.2023 and finally a week's time was granted to comply office objections, failing which office was directed to list this matter for dismissal on 29.05.2023.
RSA No. 794 of 2020
The appeal is listed today. So far, office objections are not complied with.
Despite giving several opportunities, appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections. It appears that appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
In view of earlier peremptory order dated:22.05.2023, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
Sri Sunil Narayan
Sri Ravichandra
K N Nagaraju
Sri Dodda Muniyappa
Sri Munirathnamma
Ms Rajamma
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court