Regular second appeal under Section 100 of CPC filed against a judgment passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge. The appeal was dismissed as settled out of court on a memo filed by the appellant's counsel.
The appeal is dismissed as settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.769 OF 2017 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
THYAGARAJA S/O G LUKES, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O 2ND CROSS, ASHOKANAGARA, SHIVAMOGA CITY-577201
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI P N HARISH, ADVOCATE) AND:
MOHAMMED RAFIQ Digitally signed S/O ABDUL JABAR, by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, COURT OF R/O LINGAPURA VILLAGE, KARNATAKA MANDAGADDE HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK PRESENTLY RESIDING NEAR SHIVASHANKARA RICE MILL O.T.ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI GURURAJ R, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2023:KHC:32912 RSA No. 769 of 2017
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 10.03.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 14/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, SHIVAMOGGA AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that the parties have settled the dispute between them and they did not intend to prosecute this appeal. In view of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of
the Court.
Sd/JUDGE
SN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THYAGARAJA S/O G LUKES
MOHAMMED RAFIQ S/O ABDUL JABAR
H.P.SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
