Regular second appeal preferred under Section 100 CPC was heard without any submissions or reasoning recorded in the judgment text; the order is an empty skeletal document with no operative part described.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
��������������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 7256 OF 2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
HUSSAINPASHA S/O KASHIMSAB GACHINAMAHAL, AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O AINAPUR TANDA, TQ: & DIST: BIJAPUR-586108.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR KALLOOR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
TQ: & DIST: BIJAPUR-586108.
Digitally signed by SOMANATH PENTAPPA MITTE Location: High Court of Karnataka
TQ: & DIST: BIJAPUR-586108.
��������������������
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O AINAPUR TANDA,
TQ: & DIST: BIJAPUR-586108.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHAITANYAKUMAR C.M, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.08.2012, PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK COURTI BIJAPUR, IN R.A.NO.152/2011, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
�����������������������������������������������������
����������������������������������������������������������
����������������
�����
������
SMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
HUSSAINPASHA S/O KASHIMSAB GACHINAMAHAL
IMAMKHSHIM S./O SAHEBLAL GACHINMAHAL
HAJARATSAB S/O SAHEBLAL GACHINMAHAL
NANNUSAHEB S/O SAHEBLAL GACHINMAHAL
GAFOORSAB S/O SAHEBLAL GACHINMAHAL
RASULSAB S/O SAHEBLAL GACHINMAHAL
C M JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
