Dismissed
Shobha @ Chand Bee v. Munichinnappa
Karnataka HCRSA/721/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 721 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 721 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 721 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.721 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
S/O ABDUL REHMAN @ ABDUL RAHIM, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
D/O ABDUL REHMAN @ ABDUL RAHIM AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/OF NO.4 VEMGAL B2 BLOCK, VEMGAL VILLAGE AND HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. N.RAMAKRISHNA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
MUNICHINNAPPA S/O LATE CHINNAPILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O NO.81, HOSAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, KAVAL BYRASANDRA R T NAGAR POST, BENGALURU.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SHAILAJA.M.N., ADVOCATE FOR C/R))
RSA No. 721 of 2022
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of May 2023. It's been a year. So far, office objections are not complied with.
It appears that the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections and appellants are not instructed in prosecuting the appeal.
As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
Sd/JUDGE
NR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a regular second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC should be admitted when appellants fail to appear and comply with office objections after a year.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shobha @ Chand Bee W/o Abdul Rehan @ Abdul Rahim
Mubarak Ali. V.A S/o Abdul Rehan @ Abdul Rahim
Salma Bhanu D/o Abdul Rehan @ Abdul Rahim
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court