Smt Dulcina Vaz v. Mr Robert Pinto
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed by several heirs/takers as withdrawn, based on a memo of settlement filed by counsel for the appellants.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed by several heirs/takers as withdrawn, based on a memo of settlement filed by counsel for the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 659 OF 2009 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
…APPELLANTS
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS a. MRS. ROMANA VAS W/O LATE BONA VICTOR VAS AGE: MAJOR
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
RESPONDENTS NO.12(A) TO (I) ARE ALL RESIDING AT POITHAJE HOUSE NARIKOMBU POST AND VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. DISTRICT-574231
…RESPONDENTS
(RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 11-SERVED; RESPONDENT NO.12 (A-F AND H)-SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT; RESPONDENT NO.12 (G & I)-SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 04.2.2009 PASSED IN R.A.NO.10/2008 THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, D.K., MANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.10.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.116/2006 (OLD NO.349/2004) ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & JMFC., BANTWAL, D.K.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
A memo for withdrawal has been filed by the learned
counsel for the appellants stating that there is an amicable
NC: 2023:KHC:24653 RSA No. 659 of 2009
settlement between the parties. The said memo is signed by appellant No.4 and enclosed with the affidavit of appellant No.4.
The said memo is taken on record.
In view of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
SMT. DULCINA VAZ
SMT. EVALIN VAZ
MRS. HILDA VAZ
MR. GILBERT VAZ
MRS. VELARIAN VAZ
MR. ROBERT PINTO
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court