disputed by the appellant herein. No doubt, the respondent also not produced any documents to show that marriage was taken place in the temple or any of the witnesses have been examined in this regard. But, the very appellant himself has filed the suit for the relief of declaration of nullity of registered marriage certificate. Hence, it is clear that the marriage was registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar. The appellant has filed the suit in the year 2005 i.e., after the initiation of the suit by his son and wife and also the material discloses that it is not an arranged marriage and even at the time of marriage also, the respondent was minor and took her to the temple and got married on 25.01.2003 and thereafter, the marriage was registered in the month of November 2003. But it is the contention of the appellant that by forcibly, the marriage was registered. But no complaint was given in this regard. Even it is assumed that forcibly the marriage was registered, what prevented him in filing a complaint immediately after the registration. He has not given any complaint. But only he had issued legal notice
