The High Court dismissed a regular second appeal as not pressed, accepting the appellant's counsel's submission that the parties had amicably settled the matter.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed due to amicable settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 3035 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 3035 OF 2007 (SP)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SURESH M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M RAMASWAMY FOR R1, ADVOCATE)
RSA No. 3035 of 2007
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 11.7.07 PASSED IN R.A.NO 398/05 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, (SR.DN), & CJM, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 29.10.05 PASSED IN OS 457/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, (JR.DN), KOLAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant Sri Suresh, who appears through video conferencing submits that parties have amicably settled matter between themselves therefore appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.
not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
Sri. Muniyappa (LRS: T M Narayanaswamy)
M. Narayanaswamy
R. Jayalaxmi
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
