A second regular appeal was disposed of as infructuous and dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellants' counsel did not appear at the hearing.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2689 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
a) SUNANDA D/O LATE SHIVANNA, W/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2648, CHANNACERIJA MOHALLA II CROSS, K.G.KOPPAL, MYSORE 570001.
Digitally signed by C K LATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
b) CHANNAMMA W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, NAGUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DIST- 571401.
KASABA HOBLI, S.R. PATNA TALUK MANDYA 571401.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. M K KEMPE GOWDA, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VISHWANATH R HEGDE, ADVOCATE, FOR R1; SRI V SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 27.8.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.140/2006 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 6.1.2006 PASSED IN OS.NO.88/2001 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), SRIRANGAPATNA.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of the
appellants.
NC: 2023:KHC:32478 RSA No. 2689 of 2011
FDP proceedings. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34
Shivanna @ Shivaiah Dead by LRS A) Sunanda D/o Late Shivanna W/o Ningappa B) Channamma W/o Shivanna
Prakash S/o Shivanna
Mamatha
Mangala @ Puttamongala
Manjula
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
