Appellants failed to file paper books despite a seven-year delay and a court order. The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the regular second appeal due to the absence of paper books.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2682 OF 2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA P Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE RESIDING AT: MUDDANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK - 571 301, MYSORE DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. P. MAHESHA & KRISHNA B.J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SOMANNA, S/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT MUDDANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK - 571 301, MYSORE DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ABUBACKER SHAFI, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND JMFC AT NANJANGUD, IN R.A.NO.68/2009 DATED:12.10.2011 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND PRINCIPAL JMFC AT NANJANGUD IN O.S.NO.29/2007, DATED: 24.06.2008.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants and learned counsel for
respondent are present before the Court.
NC: 2023:KHC:35766 RSA No. 2682 of 2011
and paper books were sought to be filed.
In view of non-filing of paper book, the appeal is
dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
CPN
Kempappa, S/O Hadamuddappa
Vasanthi, S/O Late Kempappa
Nijaguni @ Prema, S/O Late Kempappa
Sannappa, S/O Hadamuddappa
Basavanna, S/O Muddappa @ Ponnappa
Chennaswamy, S/O Muddappa @ Ponnappa
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
