The Karnataka High Court dismissed Regular Second Appeal No. 260 of 2022 for the appellant's failure to comply with office objections despite prior opportunity, citing lack of diligence.
The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 260 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.260 OF 2022 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
GUDDEGOWDA S/O S.B.MUNISHAMI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.SUNIL T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NARAYANA GOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
3. SURESH
S/O LATE NARAYANAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 102.
…RESPONDENTS
RSA No. 260 of 2022
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.T.Sunil., learned counsel for appellant has appeared in
person.
The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections.
Learned counsel for appellant submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply office objections.
Submission is noted.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 29.05.2023 and finally a week's time was granted to comply office objections, failing which office was directed to list this matter for dismissal on 05.06.2023.
The appeal is listed today. So far, office objections are not complied with.
RSA No. 260 of 2022
Despite giving several opportunities, appellant has not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections. It appears that appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
In view of earlier peremptory order dated:29.05.2023, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Guddegowda
Narayana Gowda LRS
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
