Regular Second Appeal in下进行。Appellants sought to withdraw the appeal. The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal on withdrawal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.229 OF 2023 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.106, R.H.SETTY ROAD, BANGARPET-563 114
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRINIVASA NAGAR BHANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 050.
APPELLANT NOS.6 TO 9 ARE R/AT 2ND TYPE, NEAR RAILWAY GATE BEML NAGAR, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS -563 114.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI C. PATTABI RAMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R./AT NO.173, KSRTC QUARTERS KORAMANGALA BENGALURU.
RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.96/2, SUDARSHANA LAYOUT, GARVE BHAVI PALYA, HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 058.
NC: 2023:KHC:29200 RSA No. 229 of 2023
VANIYAMBADI, TAMIL NADU
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.10.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.140/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.11.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.72/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE I/C ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KGF.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
dismissed as withdrawn.
SN; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri A. Rama Murthy
Sri. Lakshmipathy
Smt. Kokila
Smt. Dhanalakshmi
Smt. Meenakshi
Smt. Ramani
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
