paid but, PW1 admitted Rs.3,50,000/-was paid and not Rs.5,35,000/and if the sale consideration is Rs.2,20,000/- for all the 4 acres, what made him to make more amount, no explanation was given by the plaintiff. But, the same was considered by the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court and apart from that during the course of cross-examination, PW1 was confronted the document of Ex.D1 wherein amount of Rs.3,50,000/- is mentioned in the document and plaintiff had also signed the said document, but the contention of the counsel for appellant that it bears only the signature of the first defendant and not the signature of the husband G.M.Jayapala Gowda who got the property i.e., both the items by partition as well as in terms of the testamentary document. But, the fact is that the plaintiff has categorically admitted the document and signature, but contend that it is unstamped and unregistered. But in order to prove the defence of the defendant which has been taken in the written statement that it was agreed for Rs.3,50,000-/ per acre, the said document was confronted
