A regular second appeal filed under Sec. 100 of the CPC was dismissed by this Court for noncompliance of office objections after granting three weeks time to remedy the defects.
The appeal was dismissed for noncompliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 1281 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1281 OF 2018 (SP)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 27.03.2018 PASSED IN
RSA No. 1281 of 2018
RA.NO.5009/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.10.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.27/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SULLIA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was filed in the year 2018 and this Court vide order dated 27.10.2021, granted three weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which, list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the same, till date the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for noncompliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
CP
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a regular second appeal should be dismissed for noncompliance of office objections despite granted time.
SRI. N. MOHAMMAD
SRI. JAYARAMA P.
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
