A regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution on the fourth listing due to lack of representation and failure to comply with office objections.
Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:25593 RSA No. 1158 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1158 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MR. SAVADESABJAN @ SAVADE S/O LATE GUDU SAB, DEAD, REP. BY LRS',
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
2(f) MS. ARSHIYA D/O LATE SAVDE SABJAN, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, APPELLANT No.2(a) TO 2(f) ARE RESIDING AT HYRIGE VILLAGE, HANAGUDU HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT.
NC: 2023:KHC:25593 RSA No. 1158 of 2021
APPELLANT Nos. 3 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF HYRIGE VILLAGE, HANAGODU HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 106.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:25593 RSA No. 1158 of 2021
THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6 ARE R/AT SHALIM TAILOR, NALA ROAD, OLD MARKET, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants either personally or through video conferencing.
The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections for fourth time.
A perusal of the daily order sheet depicts that the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) on several occasions and time was granted to comply office objections.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of July 2023. It's almost been two years. So far, office objections are not complied.
Despite giving several opportunities, the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections.
As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal
NC: 2023:KHC:25593 RSA No. 1158 of 2021
is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance
of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
Mr. Sdadesabjan @ Sades S/o Late Gudu Sab
Ms. Mehaboobi
Ms. Sharu
Mr. Makshood
Ms. Ashif
Ms. Arshiya
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
