declaration is sought on the basis of a registered Will executed by Kalachar. In proof of will, the plaintiff has examined the attesting witness and a scribe. Both the Courts have elaborately discussed the evidence let in by the plaintiff in proof of Will. Both the Courts referring to the evidence let in by the plaintiff and in absence of rebuttal evidence let in by defendant No.1, have concurrently held that plaintiff has succeeded in proving the registered Will in his favour, which is dated 25.01.1996. The Trial Court, referring to P.W.1, coupled with the birth certificate produced at Ex.P.9, a photograph evidencing that plaintiff is found in the said photograph with the testator, has come to the conclusion that plaintiff has succeeded in substantiating under what compelling reasons the testator has made an arrangement bearing in mind the interest of a minor plaintiff. Referring to the recitals found in the Will, coupled with evidence of attesting witness, who is examined as P.W.2 and evidence of a scribe, who is examined as P.W.3, both the Courts have concurrently held that propounder of the Will has
