Mr Antony P T v. Sri Mitrasena
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeals were dismissed as withdrawn due to withdrawal memos filed by the learned counsel for the appellants.
What did the court decide?
The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:41794 RSA No. 1077 of 2017 C/W RSA No. 1078 of 2017 RSA No. 1079 of 2017 RSA No. 1080 of 2017 RSA No. 1081 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1077 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
C/W
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1078 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1079 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MR.ANTONY P T S/O T.D PAULOSE
- respondent
SRI.K.CHANDRANATH ARIGA
Coram
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1077/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court