High Court of Karnataka regular second appeal filed under Sec. 100 CPC was dismissed as the appellant filed a memo seeking its withdrawal during hearing.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1071 OF 2021 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE YOGACHARI @ RAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
Digitally signed by ALBHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/O CHURCH ROAD, KAMANUBAPU BADAVANE KASABA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA-515281
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA M N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
JAYAMMA @ JAYALAKSHMI @ BILIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O HONNAVARA VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK-573 201.
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.09.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO. 163/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.08.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.507/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, HASSAN.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
The pending interlocutory application, if any, does
not survive for consideration and stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
CA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54
SMT. ALPHAN W/O LATE YOGACHARI @ RAJU, AAPPS 2-5
JAYAMMA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
