The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a Review Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and Articles 226-227. On the petitioners' memo for withdrawal, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn while listing it for compliance.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
REVIEW PETITION NO. 675 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. PARVATHY R NAIR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed bySUMA 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Location: REVENUE DEPARTMENT HIGH VIKASA SOUDHA COURT OF KARNATAKA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560099 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
NC: 2023:KHC:36103 RP No. 675 of 2022
MUGLOOR VILLAGE, KOOGUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560099.
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.105, KATRIGUPPE GRAMATANA, 5TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU-560085.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ASMA KOUSER, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 3;
SRI. L. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2;
VIDE ORDER DATED 05.01.2023 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO 20 ARE DISPENSED WITH)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 READ WITH ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.07.2022 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.12056/2008 AND DISMISS THE
NC: 2023:KHC:36103 RP No. 675 of 2022
WRIT PETITION WITH RESPECT TO SY. NO.128 OF THE MUGALUR VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK AND HOLD THAT THE SALE DEED DATED 20.05.2013, REGISTERED AS BSG-1-008962013-2014 AT THE OFFICE OF THE SENIOR SUB-REGISTRAR, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU IS VALID.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Pursuant to the order dated 20.09.2023 passed by this Court, Mr. B.S. Venkatachalapathy, Special Tahsildar, Anekal Taluk, is present and he submits that appropriate entries are made in the revenue records that the property is vested in the State Government by virtue of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.12056/2008 and he has also placed on record the copy of the RTC.
NC: 2023:KHC:36103 RP No. 675 of 2022
memo for withdrawal of this review petition.
withdrawn.
by the Assistant Commissioner, list this petition on 06.11.2023.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to review the judgment dismissing the writ petition regarding the validity of a sale deed and vesting of land in the State Government.
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the review petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.12056/2008Referred¶50
4 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S EXCEL DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD AND MR. MOHAMMED MERAJ
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE LAND TRIBUNAL ANEKAL TALUK
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
