High Court of Karnataka dismissed the belated review petition filed by Income Tax authorities against an order in Income Tax Appeal No. 875/2018, holding no grounds existed for interference.
Review petition dismissed and connected intermediate application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 240 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
(BY SHRI. M. DILIP, STANDING COUNSEL)
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
M/s. EIT SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HEWLETT PACKARD, GLOBAL SOFT PVT LTD.,) (IN THE CASE OF ERSTWHILE RELQ SOFTWARE PVT. LTD.,) PLOT NO.39/40, ELECTRONICS CITY PHASE II, HOSUR ROAD BANGALORE-560 100 PAN:AAACR 9468C …RESPONDENT
THE REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII, RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW/RECALL THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2022 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO. 875/2018 AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS
NC: 2023:KHC:21938 RP No. 240 of 2023
AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING , THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J. , MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri M.Dilip, learned standing counsel for
the Revenue.
87 days. No ground is made out to interfere with impugned order. Resultantly, the review petition stands dismissed . Consequently, I.A.No.1/2023 also stands disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ORS.
M/s. EIT SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
