Dasharat S/O Tukaram Bamane v. Sri. Rahul S/O Laxman Patil
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH…
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
RFA CROB.NO 100016 OF 2022 (PAR/SEP/POS)
BETWEEN
OCC. MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. PLOT NO. 6, SANGAMESHWAR NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590002,
APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNASWAMY B HIREMATH, ADVOCATE )
AND
1 . SRI. RAHUL S/O LAXMAN PATIL AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. MECHANIC , R/O. SANGAMESHWAR NAGAR, APM ROAD, NEAR D.T.P BELAGAVI 590002
2 . SHRI LAXMAN S/O BASAVANT PATIL AGED 74 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. SANGAMESHWAR NAGAR,
2
APM ROAD, NEAR D.T.P BELAGAVI 590002
3 . SHRI KAPEEL S/O LAXMAN PATIL AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. MECHANIC R/O. PEERANWADI BELAGAVI - 590002.
4 . SMT. JYOTHI W/O SANJAY PATIL AGED NOT KNOWN, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. C/O SANJAY S/O KRISHNA PATIL KHANAPUR, RUMEWADI CROSS, KHANAPUR, BELAGAVI 590002.
5 . SHRI KEDARI S/O BHARMANNI PATIL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KANGRALI KHURD TQ AND DIST BELAGAVI 590002.
... RESPONDENTS
RFA.CROB IN RFA NO.100208/2017 FILED UNDER SECTION 173(A) READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.29/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BELAGAVI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
3
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
SD/JUDGE
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 03/01/2024 the Advocates for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RFA Crob.No. 100016/2022 stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated 27.11.2023.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .
R- By:-rv C- By:-rv T- By: - ran
Dasharath S/O Tukaram Bamane
Sri Rahul S/O Laxman Patil
Shri Laxman S/O Basavant Patil
Shri Kapeel S/O Laxman Patil
Smt. Jyothi W/O Sanjay Patil
Shri Kedari S/O Bharmanni Patil
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court