The High Court of Karnataka heard a regular first appeal filed to recover money. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which the court granted accordingly, subsequently dismissing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 988 OF 2022 (MON)
BETWEEN:
PRADEEP H. SONAWALA S/O. LATE. HARIYANTHLAL N. SONAWALA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/A. NO.553, SECTOR NO.3, IDEAL HOMES PROJECT TOWNSHIP, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 098
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT: MANEESHA KONGOVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.02.2021 PASSED IN OS NO. 27061/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXIV
NC: 2023:KHC:38275 RFA No. 988 of 2022
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-75), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal.
Memo is placed on record.
The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the
memo.
Sd/JUDGE
PN
Pradeep H. Sonawala
K. Sadananda Shetty
Dr. A. Parthasarthi
S.R.Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
