Hon'ble Court disposed of Regular First Appeal by allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal upon payment of substantial decretal amount and settlement of issues with trial court.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 65/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2020 (MON)
BETWEEN :
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND ALSO AT SMT. REVATHI VENKATARAMAN PROPRIETOR OF M/S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS UNIT 1, 14 INDUSTRIAL ESTATE YEDIYUR, BANGALORE-560 070. …APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. SUNITHA H. SINGH, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SRI. T.B. JOSHI SON OF SRI. T.K BALAKRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S SAMYUKTA POLYMERS A PROPRIETARY CONCERN
RFA No. 65/2020
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.1.1/2 1ST FLOOR 1ST CROSS, H. SIDDAIAH ROAD WILSON GARDEN BANGALORE-560 027. …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. Y. GANESH BHAT, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.09.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.488/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt. Sunitha H. Singh, learned Advocate for appellants
has filed a Memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
2. Memo reads as follows:
MEMO
The undersigned advocate for the Appellant most respectfully submits that, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the Appeal as the Appellant has paid substantial sum of decretal Amount to the respondent decree holder and the parties are in the process of settling the issues before the Trial Court.
The Appellant most respectfully submit that, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the appeal as not pressed and direct the office to refund the entire
RFA No. 65/2020
court fee to the appellant herein in the interest of justice and equity.
3. In view of the Memo, appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn .
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SPS
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS & MRS. REVATHI VENKATARAMAN
SRI. T.B. JOSHI
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
