Dismissed
Prakash v. Smt. Bhagyamma @ Lingamma. M
Karnataka HCRFA/588/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 588 OF 2018
BETWEEN
PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O ANJANAPPA, AMRUTHESHWARI NILAYA, AGRA POST, SOMASUNDARAPALYA, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU.
...Appellant
AND
RFA.No.588/2018
2
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NELAGADHARANAHALLI, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, NAGASANDRA POST, YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU.
S/O LATE HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NELAGADHARANAHALLI, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, NAGASANDRA POST, YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU
W/O LATE KARETHIMMAIAH, MAJOR NO.1ST MAIN ROAD, RAGI MACHINE, NAGASANDRA POST, NELAGADHARANAHALLI, YESHWANTHPURA BENGALURU.
5 . N NARAYANASWAMY S/O NANJAPPA, MAJOR NO.251,4TH MAIN, NEAR MARAMMA GUDI, NELAGADHARANAHALLI, BANGALORE
6 . N HANUMANTHARAJU S/O NANJAPPA, MAJOR, NO.251,4TH MAIN, NEAR MARAMMA GUDI, NELAGADHARANAHALLI, BANGALORE
RFA.No.588/2018
3
7 . M NANJAPPA S/O NANJAPPA, MAJOR NO.251,4TH MAIN, NEAR MARAMMA GUDI, NELAGADHARANAHALLI, BANGALORE.
….Respondents
This Regular First Appeal filed under order XLI rule 1 R/W Section 96 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.12.2017 passed in O.S. No.6464/2005 on the file of the XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE partly decreeing the suit for partition.
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
As a last chance, two weeks time is granted to
comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied with, the appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RFA.No.588/2018
4
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.08.02.2023 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : YL C By : VL
Prakash
Smt. Bhagymamma @ Lingamma
Narayanaappa
Hanumantiah
Hanumakka
N Narayanaswamy
N S Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court