Regular First Appeal dismissed as infructuous. The appellant filed a memo seeking dismissal on the ground that the appeal had become infructuous, relying on supporting submissions.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous based on the appellant's own memo and submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:19653 RFA No. 493 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 493 OF 2020 (EJE)
Between:
Sri Sanjeev J R Age 41 Years S/O Ramachandrappa R/at No: 149/76, Apoorva Layout, 13th Block, 2nd Stage, Nagarabavi, Bengaluru - 560072
…Appellant
(By Sri. Rajesh Rao K., Advocate) And:
Digitally signed by BANGALORE MADHAVACHAR VEENA Location: High Court of Karnataka
Sri Dr K Nagesh S/O Late Sri Kalappa R/at No: 87, ‘Nikitha’ Behind Choudeshwari Petrol Bunk, Gayathri Extn., Chennarayanapattana - 573116 …Respondent (By Sri. Narasimharaju, Advocate for caveator/respondent) ****
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with the following prayer:
“ 01. the above appeal may kindly be allowed/taken in to consideration and issue the necessary direction or, pass any order in the like nature in the interest of the appellant
directing the Court below to stay the further proceedings in Ex.Caase No.506/2020;
02. To call for entire records;
03. To set aside the order dated 12/02/2020 of delivery warrant, in execution case No.506/2020 pending before the Honourable C.C.H.56, City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru;
04. To grant such other reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.”
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Called again in the afternoon.
Learned counsel for the appellant, who is physically present
before the Court, files a memo, seeking dismissal of this appeal as
having become infructuous.
In view of the memo and the supporting submission of the learned counsel for appellant, the appeal stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Sanjeev J R
Sri Dr K Nagesh
H.B. Prabhakar Sastry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
