Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC was dismissed as the appellant failed to file paper-books despite sufficient time granted.
The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:38224 RFA No. 248 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE FORMERLY BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.ROAD,
BANGALORE – 560 002.
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. M A SUBRAMANI, ADVOCATE (N.O.C FILED) SRI G NAGARAJULU NAIDU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…APPELLANT
…RESPONDENTS
(V/O DATED 4/4/2017 APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS ABATED; GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.10.2010 PASSED BY THE XXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, (CCH 9) PASSED IN O.S.NO.3936/2000 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:38224 RFA No. 248 of 2011
JUDGMENT
Paper-books are not filed despite granting sufficient time. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
SRI FIYAZ KHAN
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
