Dismissed
H Kiran Kumar v. Kamalakshi
Karnataka HCRFA/246/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
First regular appeal against a partition decree was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant counsel due to settlement between parties.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
NC: 2023:KHC:27452 RFA No. 246 of 2017
¶2
- 1 -
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶4
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
¶5
BEFORE
¶6
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2017 (PAR)
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- H. KIRAN KUMAR, S/O H CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT JANAKI, DOOR NO.3-1-52 F, CHANDU POOJARY COMPOUND, NH-17,AMBALPADI, NEAR PALLAVI RICE MILL, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 103.
¶9
- ARUNA UMESH, W/O SRI. UMESH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT JANAKI, DOOR NO.3-1-52 F, CHANDU POOJARY COMPOUND, NH-17 AMBALPADI, NEAR PALLAVI RICE MILL, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 103.
¶10
…APPELLANTS
¶11
Digitally signed by HARSHITHA B
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
H. KIRAN KUMAR
- appellant
ARUNA UMESH
- respondent
KAMALAKSHI
- respondent
VARUN KUMAR
- respondent
VANDANA KUMARI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/246/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court