Muninarasaiah v. Puttabuddi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of suit held abated due to statutory limitation and non-substitution of deceased appellant's legal representatives.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:20190 RFA No. 182 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2016 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MUNINARASAIAH S/O. LATE MARI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT GIDADAKONENAHALLI VILLAGE YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE-560 091.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. JAYASIMHA K P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
PUTTABUDDI S/O. VEERAPPA Digitally signed SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR, by MAHADEV KUMAR DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY S/O. LATE PUTTABUDDI Location: High AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS Court of RESIDING AT NO.1133/A Karnataka SERVICE ROAD, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 040.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Muninarasaiah S/o. Late Mari Muniyappa
- respondent
Mahadev Kumar Dhanalakshmi Murthy S/o. Late Puttabuddi
Coram
H.T. Narendra Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/182/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court