The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular first appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC that was not pressed by the appellant, as the matter had been settled between the parties at a Lok Adalath.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; pending interim applications disposed; court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1737 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. P. B. RAJU, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by JYOTHI S Location: High Court of Karnatka
AND:
ARE RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, KIRSHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI,
NC: 2023:KHC:26909 RFA No. 1737 of 2021
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 045.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.4078/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants have filed a memo to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the matter
has been settled between the parties before the Lok Adalath.
placed on record.
settled between the parties.
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35 CT:SNN
Sd/JUDGE
PADMINI SADANANDHAN
SADANANDHAN
M. KEMPANNA
MUNIRAJU K.
MUNEGOWDA K.
G. RAMESH
K. NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
