Muniyappa v. Muniyappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular first appeal in an injunction suit was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant had died before the hearing and no legal representatives were brought on record.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
- 1 -
RFA No. 168 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2008 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
MUNIYAPPA S/O.LATE.DODDABBAIA AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT.NO.111/1,YELLUKUNTE BEGUR HOBLI,BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK MADIVALA POST,BANGALORE-68.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S SHAKER SHETTY.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ANIL KUMAR SHETTY.)
AND:
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Muniyappa S/o Late Doddabbaia
- respondent
Muniyappa S/o Late R. Muniswamappa aka Maj. R
- respondent
Gayathri
- respondent
Sharada
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/168/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court