M Raju v. Smt Sarojamma
Case brief
What is this about?
First appeal filed under CPC Sec. 96 against a partition decree. Appeals' counsel failed to comply with office objections. Dismissed for non-compliance and inability to argue merits.
What did the court decide?
Service next dates suspended; appeal dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:19664 RFA No. 165 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2022 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
- M RAJU AGED 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI.G.MUNIYAPPA,
- SMT.GOWRAMMA
AGED 47 YEARS, D/O LATE SRI.G.MUNIYAPPA W/O SRI.C.MUNIRAJU,
- M.SUBRAMANI
AGED 45 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI.MUNIYAPPA,
Digitally signed by VEENA KUMARI B Location: High Court Of Karnataka
ALL ARE R/AT OPP.OM MARKETING, 2ND MAIN, NEW MASJID ROAD, T.DASARAHALLI, TUMKUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560057.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeal should be allowed for non-compliance of office objections.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M Raju and others
- respondent
Smt Sarojamma and others
Coram
H.B. Prabhakar Sastry
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/165/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court