Regular First Appeal filed under Sec.96 r/w Order XLI Rule 1 CPC against judgment dismissing suit for partition. Bench dismissed appeal for non-prosecution due to absent appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:37391-DB RFA No. 1606 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1606 OF 2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SMT. KUMARI PUNYA, APPELLANT No.1 (ABSENT) SMT. KUPPANDA ROHITA, APPELLANT No.2 (ABSENT)
AND:
(BY SRI SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.08.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.44/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, VIRAJPET, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri T.N.Raghupathy, learned advocate for the appellants has passed away. Court notice was issued to the appellants on 07.06.2023. Though served, both the appellants are absent. In the circumstance, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
YN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
KUMARI PUNYA, REPRESENTED BY KUPPANDA ROHITA
SMT. KUPPANDA ROHITA
KUPPUNDA RAJAPPA
MASTER YASHANK UTAPPA, REPRESENTED BY JOSHIKA RAJAPPA
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
