In Regular First Appeal No. 1540 of 2007, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC as not pressed based on the appellant's submitted memo.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1540 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1540 OF 2007 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
KODANDARAMAIAH S/O LATE MOTAPPA KAMMAGONDANAHALLI YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. GURUDATH B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS ABATED NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
RFA No. 1540 of 2007
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.03.2007 PASSED IN OS.NO.4373/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, CCH-16, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 30.05.2023 stating that the above appeal may be
dismissed as not pressed.
3. Accordingly, the above appeal is dismissed as
not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
HA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kodandaramaiah
Kesava Murthy
Renukaradhya
H.T. Nanditha Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
