The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the regular appeal as not pressed, despite the appellant filing a memo suggesting dismissal.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1527 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1527 OF 2015 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI.C. MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT NO.171, 4TH CROSS DODDANEKUNDI CIRCLE BANGALORE-560 037.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MALIPATIL P S., DVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
SMT. MAMATHA S/O N.K.BABU REDDY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS 1ST LEFT, NEAR AUTO STAND BANGALORE-560 037.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI.V. NAGA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 & 2 R/W SEC.96 CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.08.2015 PASSED IN O.S NO. 354/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
RFA No. 1527 of 2015
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 22.5.2023 stating that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
DM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. MUNIYAPPA
MAMATHA
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
