Regular first appeal filed under Section 96 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither appellant nor respondent was present for the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:43688 RFA No. 1253 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1253 OF 2008 (MON)
BETWEEN:
A JEBA JOEL SINGH S/O A ANBIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO 682, 8TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, 3RD PHASE DOMLUR, BANGALORE-71
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI PRANAV KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALSO AT
11TH KM, BANNERGHATTA ROAD AREKERE, BANGALORE-76
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI S V GIRIDHAR, ADVOCATE)
RFA FILED U/S 96 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 8.7.08 PASSED IN OS.NO.16994/02 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:43688 RFA No. 1253 of 2008
JUDGMENT
Case called out twice. None present on behalf of
appellant. Even on the last date of hearing, there is no representation on behalf of both the parties. However, today learned counsel for respondent is present.
2008 and the decree came to be passed on 08.07.2008, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff in part.
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
VK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28
A JEBA JOEL SINGH
BPL TELECOM PVT LTD
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
