This first regular appeal was filed under Section 96 CPC to set aside a judgment and decree. The appellants filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, which the court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1199 OF 2021 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
D/O LATE NEELAKANTA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE R/AT NO.82 (COURT), R/AT NO.82 (COURT) VEERAPILLAI STREET, BENGALURU - 560 042
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. S.SUBRAHMANYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ALL ARE R/AT PORTION OF NO.82 @ VEERAPILLAI STREET BENGALURU - 560 042
ALL ARE R/AT NO.62 VEERAPILLAI STREET BENGALURU - 560 042
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT AT BENGALURU (CCH-73) IN O.S.NO.15382/2006 DATED
NC: 2023:KHC:36721 RFA No. 1199 of 2021
22.02.2021 AND DISMISS THE SUIT FILED BY THE PLAINTIFFS BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MDS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
Revathi w/o Late Neelakanta
Vishnali
Vishal s/o Late Neelakanta
Kushalakumari
G. Vasanth Kumari Govindaraj
Lochen Raj M G
K. Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
