K Ramegowda Since Dead by Lrs v. K Puttaswamaiah Since Dead by Lrs
Case brief
What is this about?
2023:KHC:41580 RFA No. 1195 of 2007 IN THE…
2023:KHC:41580 RFA No. 1195 of 2007 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1195 OF 2007 (PAR/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/AT NAGUVANA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,
NC: 2023:KHC:41580 RFA No. 1195 of 2007
SRI RANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 572 138.
…APPELLANTS
AND:
K. PUTTASWAMAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS
W/O MOHAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.126, 6TH MAIN, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE.
RESPONDENT NO.1, 3 AND 4 ARE R/AT NAGUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRI RANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 572 138.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO AND SRI. MANJUNATH M., ADVOCATES FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. R.B. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R6; VIDE ORDER DATED:18.06.2021 APPEAL STANDS ABATED AGAINST R5)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.01.2007 PASSED IN OS.NO.28/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND CJM., MYSORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.R.S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel representing
appellant Nos.3 and 4 submits that despite his best
efforts, appellant Nos.3 and 4 are not coming forward to instruct further, in prosecuting the appeal.
Sd/JUDGE
KAV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 CT:SNN
Smt. P. Preamma
Sri. R. Ramasha
Sri. Mallikarjuna
Sri. R. Mahendra
Sri. N.R. Honnegowda
Smt. H.R. Savithramma
V. SRI SHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court