Appeal against a judgment and decree for partition filed under Section 96 CPC. Appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave was granted, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1054/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1054 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.L. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE H.N. LAKSHMANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO. 214, 5TH MAIN ROAD 2ND STAGE, MGES, RPC LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560 040 …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. G. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RFA No. 1054/2014
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 056
(BY SHRI. T.H. NARAYANA, ADV. FOR R1, R2 & R4; R3 – SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.03.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3480/2012 ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned advocate for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 10.01.2023 seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
H.L. MANJUNATHA
SMT. S.V. SARASWATHI
SMT. H.L. ANURADHA
SMT. H.L. UMADEVI
SMT. H.L. KALPANA
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
