This miscellaneous second appeal was dismissed as not pressed. The appellant informed the court that they did not intend to prosecute the appeal, and accordingly, the court dismissed it without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:41612 MSA No. 145 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2021 (LA)
BETWEEN:
SRI RANGEGOWDA S/O SHIVEGOWDA AGED 67 YEARS R/AT KEMPINAKOTE VILLAGE SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATTANA TQ
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.DEEPIKA, ADV. FOR SMT.RAKSHITHA D J, ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE JUDGMENT DT. 10.03.2020 IN LAC APPEAL NO.227/2018 PASSED BY IV ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE HASSAN DISTRICT AT CHANNARAYAPATNA AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 03.11.2011 PASSED IN LAC NO.44/2008 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHANNARAYAPATTANA, ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Leaned counsel Smt. Deepika, appearing on behalf of learned counsel Smt. Rakshitha. D.J., for appellant submits that the appellant does not intend to prosecute this appeal and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. A memo is filed to that effect.
pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
VK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
SRI RANGEGOWDA S/O SHIVEGOWDA
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
