The High Court of Karnataka dismissed an accident compensation cross objection heard on merit after the petitioner filed a memo withdrawing the objection filed under Order XLI Rule 22(1) CPC read with Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act.
Cross objection dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MFA.CROB No. 135 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO.135 OF 2021 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. NAGARATHNA POOJARY W/O. SURESH POOJARY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/ONAGARATHNA NILAYA HALEALIVE KOTESHWARA VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TLAUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
(BY SRI. NAGARAJA H R., ADVOCATE)
…CROSS OBJECTOR
AND:
MFA.CROB No. 135 of 2021
VODERHOBLI, KUNDAPURA REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA.CROB IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 22(1) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.01.2017, PASSED IN MVC NO.945/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MACT, KUNDAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CALIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA CROB., COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The Cross-objector has filed a memo for withdrawal
of the cross objection for the reasons stated therein.
Memo is placed on record.
The MFA Crob. is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
snc
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Nagarathna Poojary
B.A. Mohammed
The United India Insurance Co., Ltd.
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
